apple supply chain management case study

An Insight Into Apple’s Supply Chain Strategy

Apple is one of the most popular and valuable companies in the world. A large part of Apple’s success is due to its efficient and effective supply chain strategy. In this blog post, we will take a closer look at Apple’s supply chain strategy and how it has helped the company become a leading force in the tech industry. By the end of this blog post, you will have a better understanding of the complexities of Apple’s supply chain and how it contributes to the success of the company.

Table of Contents

Apple’s Supply Chain Strategy

Apple’s supply chain is a complex and intricate system responsible for the manufacturing and distribution of its products. It is a global network of suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors who collaborate to ensure that Apple products are delivered to consumers quickly and effectively.

The beginning of Apple’s supply chain is the procurement of basic materials. Apple works with global suppliers to acquire the necessary components to manufacture its products. These components are then transported to Apple’s manufacturing facilities, where they are used to assemble finalized products.

Once products have been assembled, they are sent to Apple’s distribution centers. The products are packaged and dispatched from this location to Apple’s retail stores, its online store, and other retailers. Apple collaborates with third-party logistics providers to ensure timely and efficient delivery of products to customers.

Apple also employs a rigorous quality assurance procedure to ensure that all of its products satisfy the company’s stringent requirements. This includes thorough inspections of the manufacturing process and testing of components and finished products.

In the previous blogs, we looked into the supply chains of famous and leading companies, which you can read about each of them in the section below.

Apple’s Global Supply Chain Management

Apple is a successful business due to its global supply chain, which allows it to quickly and efficiently source parts and materials from all over the globe and deliver them to its factories. Apple has many distinct partners, including suppliers, manufacturers, and logistics companies, and maintains constant communication with them to ensure they can uphold the company’s standards for dependability and quality. Additionally, Apple collaborates with its suppliers to make sure they can adhere to its manufacturing deadlines and schedules.

Apple works with logistics partners to manage its supply chain, organizing parts and supplies, and supporting inventory management efforts. Apple uses SCM and ERP systems to track and manage its inventory levels.

Finally, Apple has implemented a variety of various strategies to guarantee the effectiveness and efficiency of its global supply chain. Among these tactics are just-in-time manufacturing, which aids Apple in lowering inventory costs, and lean manufacturing methods, which aid Apple in cutting waste and boosting productivity.

The global supply chain for Apple is very successful and economical. Apple is able to obtain parts and materials from all over the world and deliver them to its factories quickly and affordably by utilizing its partnerships, technologies, and business strategies.

The Benefits of Apple’s Supply Chain Strategy

Apple’s supply chain control reduces costs. Apple can give competitive prices by streamlining the supply chain, lowering output and distribution costs. Apple’s supply chain strategy lets them react rapidly to market changes like new product launches and customer demand. Apple stays competitive by adapting rapidly to market changes.

Apple’s supply chain management ensures product quality. Apple manages its supply chain to assure high-quality products. Customer happiness and loyalty are crucial to a business’s long-term success.

Finally, Apple’s supply chain management method ensures excellent customer service. Apple manages its supply chain to deliver goods quickly and cheaply. This ensures consumer satisfaction and future Apple purchases.

Strategic Innovations in Apple’s Supply Chain

Apple Inc. pioneered supply chain tactics. The company’s supply chain management strategy has helped it compete globally. Apple’s supply chain strategies aim to improve user experience, efficiency, and innovation through technology.

Apple prioritizes customer satisfaction in its supply line. Its retail shops offer personalized shopping. Apple’s online store offers consumers convenience. Apple also has a strong logistics network to send products quickly.

Apple also optimizes its supply line. The firm has taken several cost-cutting and efficiency measures. Apple uses a Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory method to cut costs and speed delivery. Apple has also automated and robotized output.

Finally, Apple’s supply chain plan uses technology to innovate. The firm has developed several supply chain visibility and optimization software solutions. Apple also uses AI and machine learning in logistics for prediction and demand planning.

The Prospects for Apple’s Supply Strategy

Apple Inc. is one of the most successful tech companies in the world, and its supply chain management is a big reason why. As the company grows, its supply chain must change to keep up with the business’s needs. In the future, Apple’s supply chain management will have to focus on sustainability, efficiency, and customer service.

Sustainability

Apple is embracing sustainability in the tech sector. The firm uses renewable energy and reduces packaging waste. Apple must keep investing in renewable energy, lowering emissions, and using sustainable materials in its goods.

Apple’s supply chain strategy prioritizes efficiency. The supply chain must meet consumer demand at low cost. Apple must engage in automation and AI to streamline its processes. The firm will save money and improve service.

Customer Service

Apple thrives on customer service. The firm must deliver orders quickly and accurately. Apple needs chatbots and automated customer support systems to do this. This improves customer care and lowers costs.

If you are looking for a digital freight forwarder in the UAE , Look no further than DFreight! We offer a digital app and online platform that makes it easy to manage your supply chain. We can help you develop a customized supply chain strategy that meets your specific needs. Contact us today to learn more!

How does Apple source its components and materials?

Apple sources its components and materials from a variety of suppliers around the world. It has a team of experts that negotiate contracts and manage relationships with suppliers. Apple also has a supply chain management team that works with suppliers to ensure that they meet Apple’s quality standards and delivery deadlines.

How does Apple manage its supply chain?

Apple has a team of experts that manage its supply chain. They work with suppliers to ensure that they meet Apple’s quality standards and delivery deadlines. They also work to optimize the supply chain to improve efficiency and reduce costs. 

What are some of the challenges that Apple faces with its supply chain?

One of the challenges that Apple faces is managing the complexity of its supply chain. Apple sources its components and materials from a variety of suppliers around the world. Another challenge is ensuring that its suppliers meet Apple’s quality standards and delivery deadlines.

Air transportation is a convenient and fast way to move cargo and is suitable for small and large companies as well as individuals. You Might Also Like

Commodities

Most Popular

({{ items.length }}) products in your cart

If you enrol in all three Foundations of Directorship courses, you will receive a package discount.

A case study of Apple's supply chain

Friday, 11 September 2015

One key aspect of Apple’s supply chain is its use of multiple suppliers for the same component. Reviews on this aspect of Apple’s supply chain strategy to examine the role that boards and directors can play in enhancing supply chain management and organisational performance.

Managing Risk in the Global Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Review, August 2015

2015 Supply Chain Top 25 Gartner, May 2015

A pple has received multiple awards for its supply chain strategy. Recently, for example, Gartner, a US-based research and advisory company, awarded Apple its inaugural “Masters” award after previously ranking Apple No. 1 on its “Top 25 Supply Chains” list for the past 5 years.

One key aspect of Apple’s supply chain is its use of multiple suppliers for the same component. The Governance Leadership Centre reviews this aspect of Apple’s supply chain strategy to examine the role that boards and directors can play in enhancing supply chain management and organisational performance.

Apple’s use of multiple suppliers for the same component in its supply chain strategy

Apple has an extensive network of third party suppliers in its supply chain. According to recent  research , Apple has 785 suppliers in 31 countries worldwide, 349 of which are based in China.

According to Apple’s “ 2015 Supplier List ”, 97% of its supply chain (including procurement, manufacture and assembly) is accounted for by its top 200 suppliers. This would imply that 585 of Apple’s suppliers account for the remaining 3% of its supply chain, providing it with a significant degree of latent capacity.

Apple has a number of exclusive long-term agreements with its key suppliers and uses prepayments to negotiate favourable pricing terms, secure strategic raw materials and guarantee high volumes of production.

Apple has also diversified its supply chain to include new manufacturing partners in China and Taiwan. It has also secured multiple suppliers for key components relating to new products (such as the  Apple Watch ).

In addition to diversification, Apple  invests  in customised manufacturing equipment and automated assembly and milling technology. It has also recently  announced  environmental programs with its Chinese manufacturing partners to offset carbon emissions and utilise more clean energy.

Apple’s strategy of using multiple suppliers for the same component provides it with key advantages over its competitors. Commentators note that this strategy allows it to:

• mitigate supply chain disruptions and delays, allowing it to maintain gross-margins;
• adjust ordering ratios with existing suppliers, therefore minimising the risk of third party issues associated with volume dependency;
• quickly increase production capacity to respond to changes in consumer demand;
• encourage lower supply costs as multiple suppliers compete for its business;
• process large volumes of pre-orders, which it then analyses to create demand forecasts; and
• prevent competitors from utilising the same production capacity through exclusive relationships with suppliers.

Apple’s Chief Executive Officer, Tim Cook, has been described as a “supply chain specialist”. He is credited for streamlining inefficient areas of Apple’s supply chain and using inventory tracking mechanisms to reduce its number of suppliers and warehouses.

What can Australian boards and directors learn from Apple’s supply chain strategy?

According to a recent  report  from Deloitte, organisations with effectively governed third party relationships can outperform their peers with an additional 4-5% Return on Equity (ROE).

There are a number of ways in which boards can learn from Apple’s supply chain model to enhance their supply chain management and organisational performance:

• Consider the benefits of multiple suppliers for the same component:   Boards should encourage management to consider the use of alternative suppliers and whether this may reduce single supplier risks or provide an avenue for improving performance. For example, a recent survey of 150 supply chain executives by  Haslam College of Business’ Global Supply Chain Institute  found that more than a third of individuals surveyed (38%) stated that their organisations’ supply chains sourced from a single supplier and only half (53%) considered their organisations had a ‘back-up’ plan due to natural disasters or major equipment failure.
• Measure and evaluate performance:   Boards should closely monitor supply chain performance by analysing financial metrics such as  inventory turnover  and the  cash conversion cycle  (CCC). These metrics can be used by boards to evaluate whether management is using the company’s financial resources efficiently.
• Encourage a compliance culture and the use of regular audits:   Boards should encourage compliance cultures within their organisations and the use of regular audits. For example, Apple has a strict code of conduct and standards that all its subsidiaries, affiliates and subcontractors are required to abide by. It also produces an annual “ Supplier Responsibility Progress Report ”, which outlines the number of audits it has undertaken and provides details on its labour and human rights initiatives, such as repayments to workers for unpaid overtime or due to excessive recruitment fees charged by brokers.

“More progressive global organisations are now starting to demonstrate bimodal thinking around how to maximise the opportunities out of the third party extended ecosystem while managing the related risks at the same time” , suggests Deloitte.

The GLC has previously interviewed  Dr Richard Welford , chair of consulting firm CSR Asia, about the role of directors in managing supply chain risks.

Latest news

Already a member?

Login to view this content

This is exclusive content.

You have reached your limit for guest contents. The content you are trying to access is exclusive for AICD members. Please become a member for unlimited access.

Rebuilding Trust: Apple Crisis Management Case Study

Crisis management is an essential skill for any business, as even the most successful companies can find themselves in challenging situations that threaten their reputation and bottom line. 

One such case that garnered significant attention and scrutiny is the Apple crisis. 

Apple, the tech giant known for its innovation and loyal customer base, faced a crisis that put its brand and reputation at risk. 

In this blog post, we will delve into the Apple crisis management case study, exploring the challenges faced by the company, the strategies implemented to navigate the crisis, and the lessons learned from their experience. 

By examining Apple’s crisis management approach, we can gain valuable insights into the importance of proactive crisis management and its impact on businesses in today’s hyper-connected world.

Let’s dive in and learn more 

Overview of Apple’s history and brand image

Apple, founded in 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne, has emerged as one of the most influential and valuable companies in the world. The company’s journey began with the creation of the Apple I, a personal computer that laid the foundation for their future success.

Over the years, Apple revolutionized various industries, introducing groundbreaking products such as the Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch.

One of the key factors contributing to Apple’s success is its unwavering commitment to innovation. The company’s ability to anticipate and meet consumer needs with cutting-edge technology has consistently set it apart from its competitors. Apple’s products are renowned for their sleek designs, user-friendly interfaces, and seamless integration across its ecosystem.

Beyond its products, Apple has cultivated a distinctive brand image that resonates with consumers worldwide. The company’s brand is synonymous with excellence, creativity, and a forward-thinking mindset. Apple’s marketing campaigns, such as the famous “Think Different” slogan, have fostered a sense of aspiration and uniqueness among its customers.

Furthermore, Apple has successfully built a loyal and passionate community around its products. The Apple ecosystem encourages users to remain within the brand’s ecosystem, promoting customer retention and brand loyalty. This devotion is evident in the enthusiastic anticipation and high demand for new Apple product launches.

Explanation of the crisis situation faced by Apple

Apple, a company known for its strong brand image and customer loyalty, faced a significant crisis that posed a considerable challenge to its reputation. The crisis situation arose when reports and allegations surfaced regarding unethical labor practices in Apple’s supply chain.

These reports highlighted issues such as poor working conditions, excessive overtime, child labor, and inadequate safety measures in some of the factories producing Apple products.

The crisis was exacerbated by extensive media coverage and the viral spread of information through social media platforms. News outlets, consumer advocacy groups, and concerned individuals amplified the allegations, putting pressure on Apple to address the situation swiftly and transparently.

The crisis not only raised ethical concerns but also posed a threat to Apple’s brand image. The company’s reputation for innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction was at risk of being tarnished by association with these labor controversies.

Apple was faced with the challenge of not only addressing the immediate issues within its supply chain but also effectively managing the perception of its commitment to social responsibility and ethical business practices.

Factors that led to the crisis

The crisis faced by Apple regarding unethical labor practices in its supply chain was influenced by several factors that contributed to the emergence and escalation of the issue.

• Globalized Supply Chain: Apple’s success as a global technology leader relies on a vast and complex supply chain spread across various countries. The company sources components and assembles its products through a network of suppliers and subcontractors worldwide. The extensive reach of this supply chain increases the difficulty of monitoring and ensuring ethical practices at every stage.
• Outsourcing and Cost Pressures: To remain competitive, companies like Apple often outsource production to regions with lower labor costs. This outsourcing, while driving efficiency and cost savings, can sometimes lead to compromised labor standards. Suppliers under cost pressures may resort to exploitative practices such as excessive working hours, low wages, and poor working conditions to meet demand and maintain profitability.
• Lack of Supply Chain Transparency: Managing a complex supply chain poses challenges in terms of visibility and transparency. Apple, like many other companies, faced difficulties in monitoring and enforcing labor standards across its entire supply chain. The lack of transparency made it challenging to identify and address ethical issues promptly, allowing problems to persist and potentially escalate.
• Limited Supplier Oversight: Despite Apple’s efforts to implement supplier codes of conduct and auditing processes, the sheer number of suppliers and subcontractors involved made it challenging to maintain stringent oversight. This resulted in instances where unethical labor practices went undetected or were inadequately addressed.
• Social Media and Activism: The rise of social media platforms and increased activism empowered consumers, workers, and advocacy groups to expose and publicize the labor issues within Apple’s supply chain. The widespread dissemination of information and the ability for individuals to amplify their concerns quickly led to significant reputational risks for the company.

Impact of the crisis on Apple’s brand and reputation

The following are key impacts of the crisis on Apple’s brand and reputation:

• Brand Perception : The crisis undermined Apple’s carefully cultivated brand image. The allegations of unethical labor practices tarnished the perception of Apple as a company that prioritizes the well-being of its workers and upholds high ethical standards. The negative media coverage and public scrutiny eroded trust and raised doubts about the authenticity of Apple’s commitment to responsible business practices.
• Consumer Trust: Apple’s loyal customer base, which had been drawn to the company for its innovative products and perceived values, was confronted with allegations of worker exploitation. This eroded the trust and loyalty that customers had placed in Apple. Concerned consumers started questioning the ethics behind their purchasing decisions and may have become hesitant to support the brand.
• Investor Confidence: The crisis had implications for investor confidence in Apple. The negative publicity and potential ethical implications affected the perception of Apple’s risk management practices and corporate governance. Investors may have raised concerns about the company’s ability to effectively manage supply chain risks and protect its brand value, leading to potential impacts on the company’s stock price and shareholder sentiment.
• Reputational Damage: The crisis resulted in significant reputational damage for Apple. The labor controversies received widespread media attention, leading to negative headlines and public discourse about the company’s ethical standards. This damage extended beyond Apple’s core customer base, reaching a broader audience and potentially influencing perceptions of the brand among potential customers and stakeholders.
• Competitive Disadvantage: The crisis also created a potential competitive disadvantage for Apple. Competitors in the technology industry could capitalize on the negative publicity and position themselves as more socially responsible alternatives. Apple’s reputation for innovation and quality alone might not be sufficient to counterbalance the ethical concerns raised by the crisis.

Apple’s Crisis Management Strategy 

Following are key aspects of Apple crisis management strategy:

Immediate response to the crisis

When faced with the crisis of unethical labor practices in its supply chain, Apple swiftly initiated an immediate response to address the situation. The company recognized the gravity of the allegations and understood the importance of proactive crisis management.

The following are key aspects of Apple’s immediate response strategy:

• Acknowledgment and Investigation: Apple promptly acknowledged the allegations and expressed its commitment to investigating the issues thoroughly. The company recognized the need for transparency and took responsibility for addressing the labor concerns within its supply chain.
• Supplier Audits: Apple conducted comprehensive audits of its suppliers to assess the working conditions, labor practices, and adherence to ethical standards. These audits aimed to identify non-compliant suppliers and gather detailed information to formulate appropriate corrective actions.
• Collaboration with Suppliers: Apple worked closely with its suppliers to address the identified issues and enforce compliance with ethical labor standards. The company engaged in open dialogue, sharing its expectations and implementing measures to improve working conditions and protect workers’ rights.
• Supplier Code of Conduct: Apple reinforced its supplier code of conduct, which outlines the expectations and requirements for ethical labor practices. The company communicated the code clearly to all suppliers and emphasized the importance of compliance. Non-compliant suppliers were urged to make necessary improvements or face consequences.

Initial actions taken by Apple to address the crisis

During the initial stages of the crisis, Apple took several immediate actions to address the labor concerns and mitigate the negative impact. These actions demonstrated the company’s commitment to resolving the issues and improving working conditions within its supply chain.

The following are some of the key initial actions taken by Apple:

• Supplier Engagement and Remediation: Apple actively engaged with its suppliers to address the identified labor issues. The company worked collaboratively with suppliers to develop and implement remediation plans that focused on improving working conditions, ensuring fair wages, and eliminating unethical labor practices. This approach emphasized corrective actions rather than simply severing ties with non-compliant suppliers.
• Worker Empowerment Programs: Apple recognized the importance of empowering workers and ensuring their well-being. The company implemented programs to educate workers about their rights, provide channels for reporting grievances, and establish mechanisms for feedback and improvement. These initiatives aimed to empower workers and create an environment where their voices were heard.
• Enhanced Supply Chain Transparency: Apple took steps to improve supply chain transparency, making information about its suppliers more readily available. The company published annual reports that detailed its supplier responsibility initiatives, audits, and progress made in addressing labor concerns. This transparency aimed to build trust among stakeholders and hold Apple accountable for its actions.
• Collaboration with Industry Peers: Apple actively collaborated with other industry leaders and stakeholders to address the systemic challenges within the technology supply chain. By partnering with organizations and sharing best practices, Apple sought to drive industry-wide improvements in labor practices and create a more sustainable and ethical supply chain.

Crisis containment and damage control

In addition to the immediate response, Apple implemented crisis containment and damage control measures to limit the negative repercussions of the labor crisis. The company recognized the importance of effectively managing the situation to protect its brand and reputation.

The following are key actions taken by Apple for crisis containment and damage control:

• Clear Communication: Apple developed a comprehensive communication strategy to address the crisis. The company proactively communicated with stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, and the public, to provide updates on the progress made in resolving the labor issues. Transparent and timely communication aimed to rebuild trust and maintain transparency throughout the crisis.
• Public Statements and Apologies: Apple’s top executives issued public statements acknowledging the gravity of the situation and expressing apologies for any harm caused. The company took responsibility for the issues within its supply chain and emphasized its commitment to remediation and preventing similar incidents in the future. Public apologies were crucial in demonstrating accountability and a willingness to learn from the crisis.
• Continuous Improvement and Reporting: Apple emphasized continuous improvement by regularly reporting on its progress in addressing the labor crisis. The company shared annual reports, sustainability updates, and supplier responsibility progress reports to showcase the strides made in improving working conditions and upholding ethical practices. Transparent reporting aimed to rebuild trust and demonstrate Apple’s ongoing commitment to accountability.

05 lessons learned from Apple Crisis Management Case Study

These lessons learned from Apple crisis management case study can serve as valuable takeaways for other organizations facing similar challenges. 

Let’s discuss each of these:

Proactive auditing and monitoring

Apple learned the importance of proactive auditing and monitoring of its supply chain to identify and address potential issues. Regular audits and inspections help ensure compliance with ethical standards and allow for early intervention and remediation.

Transparent communication

The crisis highlighted the significance of transparent communication with stakeholders. Apple realized that timely and honest communication about the crisis, its causes, and the steps taken to address it was essential for rebuilding trust and maintaining transparency.

Supplier collaboration and support

Apple recognized the need for collaboration and support with its suppliers. The company learned that working closely with suppliers, providing resources, guidance, and training, helps improve ethical practices and strengthens the overall supply chain.

Long-term commitment

Apple understood the importance of a long-term commitment to addressing the crisis and preventing future incidents. The company recognized that sustainable change requires ongoing efforts, continuous improvement, and a steadfast commitment to ethical practices and responsible business conduct.

External validation and partnerships

The crisis highlighted the value of external validation and partnerships. Apple sought certifications and accreditations from recognized third-party organizations to provide independent verification of its efforts. Collaborating with industry peers, NGOs, and advocacy groups allowed Apple to gain insights, share best practices, and drive collective change.

Final Words 

Apple crisis management case study provides valuable insights into how a company can navigate and recover from a crisis while minimizing the negative impact on its brand and reputation. The labor crisis presented Apple with significant challenges, but the company responded with a comprehensive and strategic approach.

Ultimately, Apple crisis management case study highlights the significance of a holistic approach that goes beyond immediate crisis response. By taking responsibility, implementing meaningful actions, and fostering a culture of responsible business conduct, a company can rebuild trust, enhance its reputation, and position itself as a leader in ethical practices and sustainability

About The Author

Tahir Abbas

Related posts.

What is the Best Way to Reinvent Yourself? – Explained

Nokia Change Management Case Study

Advantages and Disadvantages of an Agile Organization

Critical Success Factors for a Sustainable Supply Chain: The Case of Apple Inc.

• November 2023
• Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences 39(1):11-16

• University of Malaya

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Sanjoy Kumar Paul

• J CLEAN PROD

• J Supply Chain Manag

• Steve Teichman
• Tobias Timpernagel
• Connor Myers
• Kalmanovitz Fellow
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

How the Apple Supply Chain Stays Top Ranked in the World

Known around the world for its sleek, modern designs and cutting-edge products,  Apple  has remained at the forefront of its industry for years. While many people are familiar with the technology giant’s offerings and branding, and, of course, high-quality products with advanced technology like the iPhone, MacBook, and iPad, the inner workings of its supply chain are lesser-known.

Apple Store, Timis, Romania, Image Credit: Shutterstock/Korosi Francois-Zoltan

In the supply chain sector, Apple is widely regarded as an innovative leader, providing inspiration for other brands and forcing the competition to keep up to the same standards with their supply chains, or risk falling behind. But how does Apple manage to always stay at the top in this regard?

Below, we take a look at a few defining features of Apple’s supply chain.

Apple’s Strong Supplier Relationships

By focusing on maintaining strong relationships with its supply chain partners, Apple can provide great flexibility in response to demand surges. This, paired with Apple’s large production capacity, allows the company to provide products when and where customers want them, and accounts for much of Apple’s success.

Image Credit: Shutterstock/Roman Zaiets

The company maintains extremely strict standards for its numerous supplier companies, which are named each year in Apple’s  Supplier List . The top 200 businesses in this list make up 98% of the business’s procurement. Demanding a high-quality service from such suppliers helps ensure the final products are reliable and long-lasting.

Since Apple is consistently innovating, its various suppliers enjoy a certain degree of  stability ; even if any one of the Apple products doesn’t succeed or suffers from setbacks, suppliers can rest assured that another request for another product will likely be coming down the pipeline very soon.

To ensure these suppliers have the skills and experience they need to continue succeeding in an ever-shifting market, Apple offers educational and upskilling opportunities. More than  3.6 million supplier employees  have participated in Apple’s Clean Energy Academy since 2008. In early 2023,  Apple partnered  with the International Labour Organization, the International Organization for Migration, and global education experts to launch a $50 million Supplier Employee Development Fund to expand initiatives and develop the skills of the people across its supply chain.

Although the efficacy and efficiency of outsourcing production of finished products have come into sharper focus in recent years, Apple provides proof that it can be a sound strategy — the company outsources much of its manufacturing to China, which has provided them with the revenue needed to launch new and updated products very quickly over the years.

Apple’s Global Supply Chain Operations and Partners

As far as supply chains go, Apple’s is pretty impressive. To produce many of its products, including the iPhone and other devices, Apple uses companies with factories and operations all around the world, including China, India, Taiwan, and Japan.

Apple Store in Bangkok, Thailand, Image Credit: Shutterstock/Roman Zaiets

In Taiwan, Apple partners with Foxconn, which is one of its largest and oldest suppliers. Foxconn has approximately 35 supplier locations around the globe, including in India, Brazil, China, and Vietnam, with factories manufacturing components for Apple’s products.

The Taiwan-based companies Wistron, and Pegatron are also on Apple’s supply chain. Wistron has supplier locations in China, India, and Texas, with its factory in India being responsible for a large part of the manufacturing of many of the printed circuit boards and other components for Apple’s iPhones.

Although Apple has diversified its supply chain in recent years, China is still one of its main supply locations. Goertek and Luxshare are Apple’s major suppliers in China, while it also works with Murata in Japan, and Samsung in South Korea.

More well-known perhaps (even more so than the company’s relationship with Foxconn) are Apple’s American suppliers, Qualcomm and Intel (although Apple has moved away from using Intel chips since developing its own  Apple Silicon  — the future of its relationship with Intel remains to be seen).

Strategic Inventory Management

Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, is well known for his focus on  inventory and the supply chain as a whole. It’s no wonder, given that retaining a lean, streamlined  inventory management  system is especially important in the tech industry, where new items can practically eliminate consumer interest in older models.

Apple Store in New York’s Upper West Side, Image Credit: Shutterstock/rblfmr

“Inventory is fundamentally evil,” Cook once  said of the tech device sector. “You kind of want to manage it like you’re in the dairy business. If it gets past its freshness date, you have a problem.”

Apple keeps  as little inventory as possible , providing them with the agility they need should a competitor release an innovative new product, thereby decreasing the value of any items in stock at that moment. Furthermore, having fewer SKUs to keep track of allows for more accurate forecasting.

Cook’s  inventory-tracking mechanisms  have also provided the company with a strong competitive edge, reducing the number of suppliers and warehouses and helping to hold members on its supply chain accountable for their quotes.

Sustainability Focus

Apple has introduced various initiatives throughout the years to improve  sustainability  across the supply chain. In 2020, for example, Apple announced its goal of creating a  closed-loop supply chain , meaning that eventually every product would be made solely from recyclable or renewable products, with the same high product quality we have come to expect from the brand.

Image Credit: Shutterstock/Quality Stock Arts

Today, every one of its global facilities is powered by  renewable energy , while newer products, such as the MacBook Air, are made from 100% recycled aluminum. The company has also invested heavily in a mix of  clean energy technology , such as solar and wind. Its online Clean Energy Portal allows suppliers across the globe to identify renewable sources.

In 2018, Apple and its suppliers’  clean energy generation  equaled approximately the amount of electricity needed to power more than 600,000 homes in the United States. Not only do these efforts benefit the environment, but they also provide customers with peace of mind that they’re  supporting ethical businesses  — an increasingly  important factor  for today’s consumers.

Apple’s Goal of a Completely Carbon-Neutral Supply Chain

After publicly announcing its plans for a completely carbon-neutral supply chain by 2030 a few years ago — and already reaching a carbon-neutral status for its global corporate emissions — Apple provided an update in early 2023 and explained that its manufacturing partners now globally support over 13 gigawatts of renewable electricity. This comes at an almost 30 percent increase over the last year.

The green initiative, the Apple Supplier Clean Energy Program, has seen Apple investing in 500 megawatts of solar and wind in Japan and China and requested that its suppliers decarbonize all Apple-related operations, which included sourcing 100 percent renewable electricity. In the past year, over 40 of its manufacturing partners have joined the program to help reach the goal by the 2030 deadline.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Apple Supply Chain

Since Apple has famously relied on many suppliers in China, it faced challenges in bouncing back from the  global coronavirus pandemic .

Central Apple Store in CF, Toronto, closed due to Covid-19 in March 2020, Image Credit: Shutterstock/eskystudio

Operations slowed in the wake of lockdowns across much of the world, and some areas experienced longer shipping timelines. For example, analysts had largely reduced their  shipment estimates  in 2020.

However, Apple powered through. During the pandemic, Apple  donated  to many organizations focused on COVID-19, with Cook further doubling the company’s donations. Apple partnered with suppliers to source more than 20 million N95 masks for U.S. healthcare workers on the frontlines, along with more donated across Europe. Apple also manufactured  face shields  for medical workers.

Lessons to Learn From Apple’s Supply Chain

Businesses looking to draw from Apple’s supply chain successes would do well to follow the three points outlined above — strong relationships, strategic inventory management, and sustainability initiatives.

Image Credit: Shutterstock/Md. Latif Mamun

While most companies don’t operate on the vast scale that Apple does, there are certainly ways to incorporate these factors into your business model. For example, streamlined inventory may make sense for other tech businesses, and  strengthening relationships  with manufacturers and suppliers makes sense for companies of all kinds, helping to ensure end-to-end reliability and transparency.

As consumers become increasingly conscientious, companies focusing on environmental and social responsibility will benefit from a heightened reputation and boosted brand image — all while remaining well-positioned for the future and preparing for any potential changes in regulations or consumer demands.

Other Related Articles

• Apple Is Spending $450 Million on Satellites — Here’s Why
• Apple Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability
• Apple’s New Software Lets You Buy Gas from the Comfort of Your Car

2 Hyundai, Kia Team Up to Boost EV Batteries Written by Kat de Naoum

3 Hitachi Rail Decreases Spend, Lowers Energy Use with NVIDIA AI Reviewed by Brooklyn Kiosow, MFA , Written by Devon Verbsky

4 DoD Breaks Ground on Project Pele Nuclear Reactor Reviewed by Brooklyn Kiosow, MFA , Written by Nolan Beilstein

5 The Complete List of Bernard Arnault Companies  Written by Laura Ross

Apple’s supply chain transformation

In 2022, Apple lost US$1.5 billion in Black Friday sales due to iPhone supply constraints. One in three retail stores across the US and Europe experienced stockouts of the new iPhone 14 Pro. China sales were down more than 30% year on year. Apple’s stock had dropped 29% in 2022. China’s zero-Covid policy resulted in massive lockdowns that made factory working conditions unbearable. In the second half of 2022, many Chinese workers quit their jobs at Apple’s Foxconn facilities. The Russia-Ukraine war that started in February 2022 and the ensuing Western sanctions spurred an unprecedented global energy crisis and double-digit inflation. Now that supply chain disruptions, component shortages and rising geopolitical tensions had become a reality, Apple had to decide on a transformation, knowing that the transition presented difficult trade-offs and would take years to complete: (1) Which elements to change in the company’s global value chain? How to approach change without hurting manufacturing continuity, product quality, revenue and profitability? (2) Should Apple further drive its vertical integration in the design of chips, semiconductors, screens and assembly? Or should it adopt the Android phone manufacturers’ model and develop a broader base of suppliers?

• Define Apple’s supply chain competitive advantages and dependencies
• Analyze the factors driving the need for transformation and their impact
• Assess the options available in Apple’s global value chain adaptation to a deglobalizing world
• Evaluate the strategy and tactics for Apple’s supply chain transformation

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK Tel +44 (0)1234 750903 Email  [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600 Fax (617) 783-7666 Email  [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003 Tel +81 52 20 38 111 Email  [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services .

Research Information & Knowledge Hub  for additional information on IMD publications

In this study, we analyze how the performance-aspiration gap influences strategic change in family firms, providing evidence of the moderating role...

The case highlights the significant role played by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in reducing its environmental footprint and promoting ...

To restore Rio Tinto's social license and direct its decarbonization activities, CEO Jakob Stausholm places a strong emphasis on developing relatio...

An in-depth study into Haier’s RenDanHeYi philosophy reinforces how it enables business units to innovate and develop new products based on what cu...

With half the world going to the polls this year, how do businesses manage political risk? IMD’s David Bach suggests businesses must look beyond th...

The former Italian premier and ECB president’s call for massive EU investment is a wake-up call to Europe’s economic stagnation. But can the contin...

Innovation is a core element in the business toolbox. A new framework is helping corporate leaders integrate social sustainability in their innovat...

There is a Chinese saying that wealth does not last beyond three generations, and the reality is that sustaining family businesses is a significant...

Julia Binder and Manuel Braun delve into why a circular approach to business can help build more resilience and boost profitability.

Peter Lorange explains how artworks support his decision-making process and can also help new businesses thrive.

How Apple Is Organized for Innovation

It’s about experts leading experts. by Joel M. Podolny and Morten T. Hansen

Summary .   

When Steve Jobs returned to Apple, in 1997, it had a conventional structure for a company of its size and scope. It was divided into business units, each with its own P&L responsibilities. Believing that conventional management had stifled innovation, Jobs laid off the general managers of all the business units (in a single day), put the entire company under one P&L, and combined the disparate functional departments of the business units into one functional organization. Although such a structure is common for small entrepreneurial firms, Apple—remarkably—retains it today, even though the company is nearly 40 times as large in terms of revenue and far more complex than it was in 1997. In this article the authors discuss the innovation benefits and leadership challenges of Apple’s distinctive and ever-evolving organizational model in the belief that it may be useful for other companies competing in rapidly changing environments.

Apple is well-known for its innovations in hardware, software, and services. Thanks to them, it grew from some 8,000 employees and $7 billion in revenue in 1997, the year Steve Jobs returned, to 137,000 employees and $260 billion in revenue in 2019. Much less well-known are the organizational design and the associated leadership model that have played a crucial role in the company’s innovation success.

Partner Center

Supply Chain Innovation

Designed by apple in california. made by people everywhere..

Business can and should be a force for good. We uphold our values everywhere we operate, supporting the people and communities across our supply chain, and working to protect the planet we all share.

A global supply chain.

Studio Display assembly, China mainland

Apple products are made all over the world.

Thousands of businesses and millions of people in more than 50 countries and regions are part of our supply chain, contributing their skills, talents, and efforts to help build, deliver, repair, and recycle our products.

Our suppliers are required to meet the strict standards of the Apple Supplier Code of Conduct , no matter where they operate or what type of goods, services, or labor they provide to Apple.

Counterclockwise from top: Apple Watch assembly, Vietnam; Apple Watch band manufacturing, Japan; Mac Pro assembly, United States

We listen. And act.

Component manufacturing, Switzerland

We encourage everyone across our supply chain to share feedback. And we’re focused on ways to amplify their voices. We interview and survey hundreds of thousands of supplier employees, and provide hotlines so they can anonymously raise concerns directly to Apple. We use this feedback to support our suppliers in strengthening their operations and providing the best possible experience for their employees.

We investigate reported concerns quickly, with Apple experts typically arriving onsite within 24 to 48 hours. Apple has zero tolerance for retaliation, and any supplier found to have retaliated against an employee for raising a concern faces immediate consequences, up to and including termination of their business with Apple. We require our suppliers to promptly address any issues, and we regularly check on their progress until we confirm that all necessary actions have been taken.

If suppliers are unwilling or unable to correct any issues, they risk removal from our supply chain. Since 2009, we have removed 25 manufacturing supplier facilities and 231 smelters, refiners, and manufacturers of materials from our supply chain for failing to meet our standards.

Counterclockwise from top: Logistics, United States; Apple Watch assembly, Vietnam; iPhone assembly, China mainland

supplier employees directly engaged by Apple about their workplace experience in 2023

improvements made to supplier workplaces based on employee feedback in 2023, mostly focused on services like transportation and dining

people at 35 supplier sites reached by our hotline awareness campaign, which provides knowledge on how to raise workplace concerns

supplier employees contacted following interviews to ensure that they didn’t experience retaliation as a result of their participation

Labor and human rights at the foundation.

Apple Watch assembly, Vietnam

Everyone has the right to work in a safe and healthy environment where they’re treated with respect and dignity. We uphold these rights with every decision we make, including the suppliers we choose to work with, the materials we select for our products, and the processes and equipment we use to make them. We work closely with our suppliers to uphold the highest standards of labor and human rights everywhere our business reaches.

Our standards apply globally, regardless of where people live or work or which job they do. We require our suppliers to educate their employees on their workplace rights, including how to share feedback if their rights aren’t being respected. With the help of experts, nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and workers themselves, we consistently strengthen our requirements and programs to make sure they continue to meet the needs of people across our supply chain.

From top to bottom: Component manufacturing, India; Studio Display assembly, China mainland

supplier employees trained on their workplace rights since 2008

supplier employees’ working hours reviewed weekly to verify compliance with our standards

education and training sessions delivered through the Apple Supplier Employee Development Fund (SEDF)

Dedicated to continuous improvement.

Product personalization, United States

Before a prospective supplier enters our supply chain, we assess their ability to meet our standards and identify areas for improvement. We hold suppliers accountable for our strict standards through regular, rigorous onsite assessments. Conducted by independent third-party auditors, these assessments look at every detail of a supplier’s operations through worker and management interviews, detailed site walkthroughs, and thorough reviews of documentation.

Suppliers must fix any violation of our standards under the supervision of Apple experts and take steps to prevent the issues from happening again. Any suppliers that are unable or unwilling to improve their operations to meet our requirements risk removal from our supply chain.

We also support our suppliers’ continual learning and improvement by having Apple experts share knowledge, advise on best practices, and design learning plans customized to the needs of each site.

Clockwise from top left: HomePod assembly, Vietnam; Component manufacturing, Germany; Fiber-based packaging production, Austria

assessments of supplier facilities conducted in 2023, including 203 unannounced visits

of prospective suppliers prevented from entering our supply chain since 2020 for being unable or unwilling to meet our requirements

The strongest standards in hiring.

Mac Pro assembly, United States

Apple has no tolerance for forced labor. Our policies that prevent forced labor apply globally, regardless of a person’s job, location, or how they were hired. We require that job recruitment processes be free and fair, prohibiting practices such as charging fees to secure a job — even where it’s allowed by law. We’ve partnered with the International Organization for Migration (IOM), a United Nations agency, to create easy-to-use tools that help suppliers recruit people ethically and with respect for their human rights.

Our work to prevent forced labor extends throughout the employment journey, and we verify that suppliers are meeting our standards every time we engage with them, including during assessments.

Learn more about our efforts to prevent forced labor (PDF)

instances found where people were forced to work in our supply chain in 2023

people trained on the industry-leading tools in the Apple Responsible Labor Recruitment Due Diligence Toolkit in 2023

in recruitment fees paid back by suppliers to more than 37,700 employees since 2008 due to Apple’s zero-fees policy

Skills that open doors.

Through the Apple Education Hub, people across our supply chain are able to access technical education and resources on topics such as personal development, leadership, computer science, coding, robotics, recycling, and advanced manufacturing. These programs enrich supplier employees’ workplace experiences and provide the skills needed to pursue opportunities in highly technical fields. For example, graduates of our Swift coding program have launched apps on the App Store, meeting the high bar required for publication.

We partner with leading experts such as the Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL) in the United States, Zhejiang University in China mainland, and St. John’s Medical College in India to ensure that our programs are innovative, meaningful, and connected to relevant opportunities in local job markets.

Clockwise from top: Component manufacturing, Japan; Component manufacturing, India; Mac Pro assembly, United States

technical or management positions attained by graduates of our education programs

supplier employees who have graduated from our Swift coding program since 2017

The Supplier Employee Development Fund.

Apple Education Hub, China mainland

Education is a powerful equalizing force, and we are committed to providing opportunities for the people in our supply chain to learn and grow. In 2022, we announced a $50 million Supplier Employee Development Fund (SEDF) to further invest in people in our supply chain. Through the fund’s Apple Education Hub, we’re expanding access to educational opportunities for supplier employees and their surrounding communities.

In partnership with local academic institutions and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the Apple Education Hub helps supplier employees develop the skills necessary to pursue new opportunities in our supply chain, as well as better manage their health and well-being.

From top to bottom: Component manufacturing, United States; Retail janitorial services, United States

supplier employee participants in learning and development opportunities through the Apple Education Hub in 2023

supplier employee participants in our education programs since 2008

Health starts with knowledge.

Education programs, India

Education programs, India

We’re committed to cultivating a supply chain where people can thrive — inside and outside work. This means providing the people in our supply chain with the tools needed to focus on their physical and mental health. Since 2017, millions of supplier employees have benefited from training on essential topics such as nutrition, reproductive health, early disease detection, and mental health. These programs are tailored to meet the needs of local supplier employee populations, equipping them with important knowledge and skills to take control of their own health, which they can then share with their communities to multiply the impact.

Counterclockwise from top: Health and wellness education, Vietnam; Health and wellness education, India; iPhone assembly, China mainland

people reached by our health and wellness programs since 2017

participants in our mental well-being programs in 2023

Advanced. Manufacturing.

Component manufacturing, United States

As we continue to drive innovation in our products, the machines used to build them must also advance. That’s why we’re always reviewing and strengthening our machine safety programs to help keep the people who operate manufacturing equipment safe on the job. We require suppliers to design safer equipment from the start and to conduct regular trainings on topics such as the use of safety devices, inspection basics, automation safety, and hazards associated with moving parts. We also require suppliers to regularly inspect equipment and safety procedures to confirm that machines remain in safe working condition and that the rules put in place to keep people safe are being enforced and followed. If we do find issues, we work with suppliers to correct them and prevent them from happening again.

Counterclockwise from top: Component manufacturing, Japan; Component manufacturing, China mainland; Component manufacturing, Germany

supplier sites enrolled in our new enhanced machine safety training in 2023

machines inspected for safety risks at 112 key supplier sites around the world in 2023

A culture of safety.

iMac assembly, Ireland

iMac assembly, Ireland

Everyone has the right to be safe at work, and we work hard to verify that the materials, machines, and processes used to make our products safeguard the health and safety of the people in our supply chain. We consistently update our industry-leading health and safety standards and confirm that our suppliers meet those standards through regular inspections. We also partner with our suppliers to build a workplace culture that puts health and safety at the forefront every day, including by offering training materials and providing ways for employees to speak up if they identify opportunities to improve safety practices.

Counterclockwise from top: Fiber-based packaging production, Austria; Mac Pro assembly, United States; Component manufacturing, Germany

supplier sites participated in safety training in 2023

Facility Readiness Assessments conducted before manufacturing began in 2023

Leading the way on smarter chemistry.

iPad assembly, Vietnam

Keeping workers and customers safe is a top priority that guides the decisions we make about the materials we use in our products. We require our suppliers to follow our industry-leading chemical safety standards to make sure that employees, communities, and the environment are protected against chemical hazards. This includes working together to use safer materials in our products and manufacturing processes, such as in the cleaners used during product assembly. By collaborating with leading experts and nonprofit organizations, we’re accelerating the adoption of safer chemicals across the electronics industry, fostering safer working conditions for people far beyond our own supply chain.

Counterclockwise from top: MacBook Pro assembly, China mainland; iPhone assembly, China mainland; Supplier water treatment facility, United States

suppliers reported data on the chemicals used in their facilities in 2023

new safer cleaners approved for use in our supply chain in 2023, with a total of 175 approved cleaners deployed to our suppliers since 2020

A carbon neutral supply chain by 2030.

Apple’s worldwide corporate operations have been carbon neutral since 2020, and we’ve set a goal to become carbon neutral across our entire supply chain, including the lifetime use of our products, by 2030.

Reaching our Apple 2030 goal means we first need to continue reducing the carbon emissions from our manufacturing processes. To make this happen, we’re designing our products to be less carbon-intensive, increasing our use of recycled and renewable materials, and transitioning our entire supply chain to 100 percent renewable energy. We’ll then use carbon removal to address the small amount of remaining emissions, starting with high-quality nature-based solutions, like those in Apple’s Restore Fund.

We’ve also called on our suppliers to decarbonize their Apple production by 2030, and we’re helping them get there through targeted programs and training that aim to improve their energy efficiency and identify sources of high-quality renewable energy.

Learn more about Apple 2030

Counterclockwise from top: Supplier solar array installation, Switzerland; Apple Watch band manufacturing, Japan; Apple Watch assembly, Vietnam

of Apple suppliers expected to be carbon neutral for their Apple production by 2030

gigawatts of renewable energy operational in the Apple supply chain

Environmental rights are human rights.

Responsibly managed forest, Austria

The global impacts of climate change are becoming more apparent by the day. Our approach to protecting the planet considers not only the environmental implications of every decision we make, but also the impact of those decisions on people, particularly those living and working in communities disproportionately affected by climate change. That’s why we consider our supply chain in the context of the local communities where our suppliers operate.

Low-income and historically marginalized communities too often bear the brunt of the effects of climate change. As part of our Racial Equity and Justice Initiative (REJI), we created the Impact Accelerator for Black-, Latinx-, and Indigenous-owned businesses focused on environmental solutions. The Impact Accelerator is just one way we’re helping ensure that those most affected by environmental challenges are also helping design solutions that dismantle the systemic barriers to addressing them.

From top to bottom: Supplier solar array installation, Germany; Supplier water treatment facility, United States

Black-, Latinx-, and Indigenous-owned businesses participated in the Impact Accelerator since 2020

A zero waste mindset.

iPhone assembly, China mainland

We’re dedicated to minimizing our resource use and waste as we build our products. We require our suppliers to avoid sending waste to landfills by implementing recycling and reuse programs and developing innovative materials and recycling strategies. Today, all established final assembly sites for major Apple products are Zero Waste Certified.

Water is a critical resource shared by people and ecosystems around the world, and we’re working to protect it for future generations. Through our Clean Water Program, we’re helping suppliers reduce their water usage, promote water recycling, and prevent water pollution. Since the launch of this program in 2015, 20 of our suppliers’ facilities have achieved certification through the Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS), the world’s leading water stewardship organization. Earning this certification requires suppliers to adopt industry-leading water conservation and stewardship practices while also engaging with their community to protect resources across their local water basin.

From top to bottom: Apple Watch band manufacturing, Japan; HomePod assembly, Vietnam

metric tons of waste diverted from landfills by Apple suppliers in 2023

gallons of freshwater saved through Apple’s Clean Water Program since 2013

Our journey to 100% recycled and renewable.

Materials recovered by Daisy, Apple’s iPhone disassembly robot, United States

Our goal is to one day build our products using only recycled and renewable materials and eliminate our reliance on mining. Each year, we move closer to that goal, with more components being made with 100 percent recycled or renewable materials. Effectively disassembling and recycling our products after their use is also a key part of our work to support a circular economy. These processes help recover valuable materials that can be used again, making the best use of limited resources and enabling us to design and build the next generation of devices to be even better for people and the planet. That’s why we help our suppliers efficiently and safely recycle our products, by providing Recycler Guides and conducting assessments to verify that they’re meeting our standards.

We maintain strict standards for the responsible sourcing of materials — whether primary or recycled. Since Apple doesn’t directly purchase or procure primary materials, we work closely with our suppliers to uphold these standards and work with partners to improve conditions in and around mining communities.

Clockwise from top: Daisy, Apple’s iPhone disassembly robot, United States; Supplier hydroelectric energy facility, Austria; Recycling, Singapore

responsibly sourced key materials in batteries, whether primary or recycled

recycled cobalt targeted to be used in all Apple-designed batteries by 2025 *

recycled rare earth elements targeted to be used in all magnets across Apple products by 2025

Read our 2024 reports to learn more about our dedication to people and the planet.

More from Apple on our global supply chain.

Your feedback makes a difference..

We welcome your thoughts, questions, and ideas about our global supply chain.

Our values lead the way.

Environment.

We’re committed to bringing our net emissions to zero across our entire carbon footprint by 2030.

Inclusion and Diversity

We’re holding ourselves accountable for creating a culture where everyone belongs.

Racial Equity and Justice Initiative

We’re addressing systemic racism by expanding opportunities for communities of color globally.

We empower students and educators to learn, create, and define their own success.

We design every product and service to keep your data safe and secure.

Accessibility

Our built-in accessibility features are designed to work the way you do.

• Programs Overview
• MSc in Management
• Full-Time MBA
• Accelerated MBA
• Accelerated MBA for HBAs
• Executive MBA
• Master of Management in Analytics
• The Ivey Academy
• Pre-Ivey Experiences
• Ivey Asia - Executive Education
• Faculty & Research Overview
• Faculty Directory
• Area Groups
• Centres & Institutes
• Ivey Impact
• Purpose, Mission and Values
• Strategic Planning
• Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
• Careers at Ivey
• Ivey Idea Forum
• Media Centre
• Contact Communications
• Alumni Overview
• Get Involved
• Benefits & Services

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

Nov 12, 2020

• Apple Podcasts

Fraser Johnson , professor of operations management at the Ivey Business School, joins host Matt Quin to take another look at his  award-winning  case,  Apple Inc.: Managing a Global Supply Chain  (2014), as well as the recently published update,  Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management  (2020).  In this episode, Johnson and Quin discuss Apple's business model, how he has brought the company into the classroom over the years, and why junior faculty ought to consider writing cases. Professor Johnson is the Leenders Supply Chain Management Association Chair at the Ivey Business School, Western University, where he teaches courses in supply chain management and operations. Johnson is also the Director of the  Ivey Purchasing Managers Index , one of the most widely watched and utilized indicators of future economic activity in Canada.

Hi, I'm at Quinn. Thanks for joining us for decision point from Ivy Publishing at the Ivy Business School. Today we returned to another award winning and best selling case. Apple INC managing a global supply chain, originally published in two thousand and fourteen. Authoring Professor Frasier Johnson from the Ivy Business School, presents a snapshot of Apple up against competitors such as blackberry and Samsu. Unlike other companies with leading supply chains, such as Walmart, apple's approach to supply chain strategy and supplier management padded, investing far less in assets to support distribution. Instead, the company is now famous for its focus on innovation, new product development and brand management. In this episode we ask Professor Johnson about how apple was able to use its business model and supply chain strategy to help it continue capturing significant value from hardware sales. We also take a look at the updated two thousand and twenty case in the increased complexity for apple as it continues to add services in products to compete in the mature smartphone market. I hope you enjoyed today's episode. So, Frasier, thanks very much for joining us today. Apple was a really different company in two thousand and fourteen. What prompted you to write the case then, and how have you audit what's changed as you've taught it throughout the years? Well, apples a fascinating company. A lot of the cases that are done in the supply chain area tend to be with traditional manufacturing companies like Toyota or large retailers like Walmart, and one of the things that really interested me about apple was or business model with the IPHONE, with these annual product introductions, with big spikes in demand, and exactly how were they able to get their supply chain organized to be able to meet these big peaks in demand that they were facing. So the great thing about cases is it puts the student in the seat of a protagonist. This particular case Examines Apple from the perspective of Jessica Grant. She's an analyst with a Toronto based Money Management Firm. You, as an author, did a great job of giving students a primer of how apple was able to reach the margins with the iphones through supplier relationships and really tight coordination of the supply chain. Can you remind listeners what's at stake in the case for apple when it was set in two thousand and fourteen. Well, apple was one of the early innovators in the smartphone business and if you take a look at what's happened to the company over the last decade or so, the iphone is a way that apple connects with their consumers. Those they do things like sell services to individuals. Really, you know, the analogy that I use in the teaching note is that the iphone represents the the the razor that they used to be able to sell the blades to the consumers. So as apple looks to expand as market in the smartphone business, really what it does is give them a platform to be able to connect with their consumers. And from the students perspective, you're putting them in the role of the analyst in the case allows them to take a look at the entire business operation as opposed to taking the role of a functional executive with a specific functional related problem. So let's talk teaching notes for a second, because you've written a lot of case as many of them are best sellers. Let's dive into the teaching note part of this. In the teaching note you mentioned flexibility as a key part of the apple supplier management strategy. With recently apple moving away from mentell process. There's in away from Samsung as a screen supplier. It seems that the company is really continuing to embrace this approach of flexibility. What do you see in the company? Back in two thousand and seven when apple launched the iphone, they basically outsourced everything. HMM. So to bring a iphone to market they had to work closely with their suppliers. And the other interesting part of this is a short product life cycle of the IPHONE. They bring a new product ote every year and that was one of the it's one of the other important parts of the case. How do you work with suppliers where you're constantly launching and relaunching a new product every year, in selling product in the in the millions? So if you take a look at a company like Walmart, for example, they practice every day low pricing, so they try to minimize the bull whip effect and provide stable demand so they can work with their suppliers to reduce their total costs. Apples a complete opposite. They embrace variability. They have, as I said earlier, these annual releases with huge product introductions, with high volumes and then volumes taper off slowly until they bring out a new product and repeat the process all over again. And so you've built this in these comparators, in in the narratives. So one of the things that we know is important about the uptake of a case, in the sales of a case, is also the teaching note, and you write great teaching notes. You've mentioned apple versus Walmart. What are some other things that you try to include in a teaching note to help a faculty member use it in the classroom? What are your keys to success? Well, you know, what you want is, as somebody writing a case, to have a teaching note that resonates with other instructors. So when I say resonates, it's got to be something that they can relate to. It doesn't want to be so complicated that when they read the case and then take a look at the teaching note, become intimidated with the material that they see. They have to be able to understand it. They'd be had to be able to translate the material that you provided the teaching note into a classroom setting, so being able to talk about the issues at instructors face, including a teaching strategy appropriate questions to ask as part of delivery of the material are all very important. The other thing that I think is important to recognize is it before the case is completed, you've also got to write the teaching note. So don't publish the case and then come back to the teaching note a month later or two months later. Rate both documents simultaneously, because you have to use your teaching note as a quality control check to make sure that there's enough information in the case for the students and the instructors to be able to complete the analysis properly. And I know something you've done and our other colleagues have done is way to finalize that teaching note, if you will, until you've taught it a couple times and see how certain questions go or there might be some new information that comes out that you can include. So I know you've done that a few times as well. Right. Yeah, for many of the cases that I've written I will go back to the great staff at I've publishing and make revisions to the teaching note and perhaps to the case I'm talking about, minor at it to make in case issues have come up in the class discussion and I can help clarify the case by making qualifying statements. Sometimes when you're right a case, even with the editing process that you go through, sometimes students don't always interpret the information properly. So gives me a chance to be able to go back in and, you know, just a couple of sentences put not tend to clarify what certain peoples of data mean. For example, one of the tips that you gave is to try to not make things overly complicated. At the time of the case there's a lot happening at at apple with the five c being released. Profit margins were down slightly from, you know, two thousand and nine to two thousand and eleven. What do you think of and consider as you're writing a case to maintain that focus without, you know, there's a lot that you can put in a case. How do you remain so focused as an author? Well, I think that you're right a case in a particular point of time and as you as you say, you know, a lot has happened at apple in the last decade, or I guess thirteen years, since they brought out the first iphone, and you know the way that I view a lot of cases. You like my one an apple my other cases on Walmart and Amazon, is that they're almost live cases in the sense that, you know, I keep crack of what's going on in these organizations throughout the year before I teach the case so that we can use the information in the case is kind of a launching board, but we can also I can also incorporate through the introduction of power point slides, for example, and other information in terms of more recent developments. In the case of Apple, you see them, for example, insourcing more product buying the chip division from Intel and moving more to insourcing mode as opposed to an outsourcing mode, and that's the kind of stuff that you can incorporate into the class discussion. You've mentioned that you've released an updated case, which is great. We encourage faculty to do that and authors to do that. We welcome that and it's a smart thing to do because the cases evolve, the companies evolved in the situations, in the environment that the business is working evolved as well. Could you talk a little bit about the new case and the new complexities for Apple? Is As we sit here, in two thousand and twenty I wrote the first apple case, as you stated earlier, in two thousand and fourteen and if you take a look at what was happening to apple at that point, the sales for iphones were on the upsway and you know, if apple had a problem at that point, it was simply keeping up with demand. Now, if you take a look at what's happening in two thousand and twenty, the situation that the company faces and the challenges for its supply chain or are a lot different. As we talked about earlier, it's more moved to more of an insourcing model. On the other side of it, sales of the IPHONE are now starting to flatten out and the smartphone market is starting to mature. So we've see in back in two thousand and fourteen, apple competing in an environment where the markets growing margins are pretty healthy and it's having trouble keeping up with the man to in two thousand and twenty, where you're facing consecutive years of sales declines of the IPHONE and a maturing market with a lot of price pressure on margins. The other thing that you see with apple in two thousand and twenty compared to two thousand and fourteen is an increased emphasis on services. So one of the things that we can talk about in the new case is how does apple manage its services supply chain? So it really gives you a double edge. On one side we can talk about changes to the iphone and what apple does to manage its iphone successfully, but also how do they use the iphone in terms of its relationships and connectivity with its customers as part of its services supply chain? I've mentioned before how popular this case is. It's been climbing up the best seller list for years. Why do you think that is it? Is it the brand? Is it because the student can hold this thing in their hands and have a relation with with the company? What do you think is made us so popular? You know, I like to say cases like this teach themselves, and you know it's an overused line maybe in some areas, but students are familiar with the company, instructors are familiar with the company. The brand is strong. Even students that don't necessarily get excited about coming to class and talking in a case discussion do like the technology companies and I think there's something in the case for people that most people, particularly students, can relate to in terms of the technology and how they use their iphones and even the debate among the students in the class, among the iphone users versus the non iphone users. So every time I teach the case I ask you know, who's using apple products, and iphones included, and who's not using them, and why is that? You know, why do you like apple? Why do you use your products? On the other end of the spectrum, who are the Anti Apple people and why have they made a conscious decision not to participate in what I call in my new case apple ecosystem? And that kind of allows us to talk about the company strategy, which then evolves into a further more detailed discussion about how they're able to support Tho strategy with their supply chain capabilities. Yeah, it's a very accessible for for students of many Undergrad students, Grad students, high school students, can they can all take a different approach with it, but apple is a company is pretty accessible. Have there been any challenges or surprises when you've taught this where you go, oh, that's a different perspective or I have to remember to the include that in my next version of the case. Anything that comes to mind. The major event for me was in two thousand and nineteen as I was teaching the case and my supply chain management elective. And you know, as I'm standing up in front of the class talking about what's happening with a company in two thousand and nineteen, about exactly how much it changed at at Apple, and you know that point. You know after I, as I do after every class, I make notes to myself in terms of things that I want to remember for the following year, I made the decision that I commit the time to updating the case and writing and ended up doing that writing the case this year. So to me, you know, when you deal with cases like apple, you know a lot of the changes and things that happen, both in the classroom as a result of what happens at the company and as part of your preparation in terms of teaching the case. Is kind of evolutionary. Is of most revolutionary. Yeah, but eventually, you know, with companies like this, you do reach a point where you've got to think about revising the product, and that's one thing I want to give as a really good tip, and I don't want to overlook this, I'm just looking at some notes I've got here, is that the importance of immediately after the class, taking down notes as an instructor H who's either taught this case a number of times or just new to it. All the great case teachers that I've seen makeup point immediately, even at the breaks, of writing down some notes about ways it could be done differently or different things to approach or something that didn't go so well. So I want to make sure that if we hit that point for those that are listening, because that's such a great tip that I don't want to overlook. So anything else that you make a point of doing right before class or during a break or right after the class as a process for case teaching? Yeah, yeah, I think that this is maybe a minor point, but I think a relevant one. I think regardless of how many times you've taught a case and regardless of whether or not you're the one that wrote the case, and sometimes I think people that write cases can be too overconfident in terms of their level of understanding with the material to invest the time before class to get ready, regret, regardless of how many times you've taught the case. So don't just pick the file up and walk into class. US remind yourself about the essential details of the case and the case facts and think about how you're going to manage the conversation with the student. And, as I said earlier the debrief after class, every time I teach a case, I sit in my office after class and make note to my teach on the front of my teaching plan in terms of things that I would adjuster do differently or things that I want to remind myself worked well and to do. And that regular pays off, because I've seen you teach. You've welcome to a lot of our team members from I be publishing to watch a teach. So I've seen it at work. As we wrap up today on the discussion, I want to come back to the writing of cases. Do you have anything that stands out to you that you wish somebody had told you when you were just starting to write cases? Any any tips for new case writers as they ventured down this road? I think that you, as a new faculty member, writing cases is a is a great way to first of all learn about management practice and if you're writing feel cases working with companies in terms of material or case development, it gives you a chance to be able to talk to managers about some of the issues that they're facing and it keeps you current and, you know, being able to and you can do that through your research, certainly, but writing cases is another way to be able to stay in touch with what's going on in terms of management practice. The second point is a writing cases helps you establish credibility with your students. Students pay attention to the material that's being used in terms of the case studies, and if your name's on the author list of the case study that they're using, it tells the students that you know you're doing work in this area. These chances are they're probably not reading your research and helps establish some credibility in terms of your familiarity with the subject matter and the material that you're using in class. Well, that's fantastic. Thank you so much, Frasier, for taking the time to speak with us and, moreover, working with our team on publishing cases and bringing cases to the class. I know when we get a submission from you, our team always enjoys the process, so thank you for that as well. It's my pleasure. Thanks for the great job that everybody to I be publishing, does and supporting the word that the faculty does in terms of writing and publishing cases. If you enjoyed today's episode, subscribe to Decision Point on spotify or wherever you listen. Be sure to check out the show notes for links to cases, resources and more. have any feedback, send us an email at cases at IV DOC A.

• Ivey Publishing

• View  PDF
• Download full issue

Accounting Forum

Owning the consumer—getting to the core of the apple business model.

• • Evaluates Apple Inc.’s post-2003 business model.
• • Apple's physical supply chain demonstrates the shortcomings of its business model.
• • Apple's content supply chain has become dependent on extensive legal protection.
• • Apple exerts control over retailers using its brand power and own retail stores.
• • Apple's multi-channel platform allows it to “own the consumer”.
• Previous article in issue
• Next article in issue

Cited by (0)

• Work & Careers
• Life & Arts

Supply chain crisis the only drag on Apple’s enormous growth

Limited time offer, save 50% on standard digital, explore more offers..

Then $75 per month. Complete digital access to quality FT journalism. Cancel anytime during your trial.

Premium Digital

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

• Global news & analysis
• Expert opinion
• FT App on Android & iOS
• FT Edit app
• FirstFT: the day's biggest stories
• 20+ curated newsletters
• Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
• FT Videos & Podcasts
• 20 monthly gift articles to share
• Lex: FT's flagship investment column
• 15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
• FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition

FT Digital Edition

10% off your first year. The new FT Digital Edition: today’s FT, cover to cover on any device. This subscription does not include access to ft.com or the FT App.

Terms & Conditions apply

Explore our full range of subscriptions.

Why the ft.

See why over a million readers pay to read the Financial Times.

Apple’s supply chain dynamics: An in-depth exploration

Apple, the technology giant, has established itself as a leader in the global market, known for its innovative products and seamless user experience. Behind this success lies a complex and vast supply chain that spans continents and involves numerous suppliers. This article explores how the scale and complexity of Apple’s supply chain influence global markets, examining the company’s efforts towards sustainability, the challenges it faces , and the controversies that have surrounded its supply chain.

The scale and complexity of Apple’s supply chain

Apple’s supply chain is a massive network that involves thousands of suppliers and partners worldwide. From sourcing raw materials to manufacturing and distribution, every step in the process is meticulously coordinated to ensure a seamless supply of products. This scale and complexity enable Apple to meet the demands of its global customer base while maintaining high standards of quality and efficiency.

The supply chain starts with the sourcing of raw materials, including metals, plastics, and glass, from various regions around the world. These materials are then transported to manufacturing facilities, mainly located in China, where they are transformed into components and assembled into final products. The finished products are then distributed to Apple’s retail stores and authorized resellers worldwide.

To provide some context, the below image shows all of Apple’s first-tier supplier (and customer) relationships as generated by our Supply Chain Links Monitor tool.

Providing a comprehensive overview, the visual representation below delves into the intricate labyrinth of Apple’s primary supplier (and customer relationships). This intricate web not only underscores the complexity of Apple’s supply chain but also offers a glimpse into the interwoven relationships that extend into the second and third tiers (available to see in our  Business and Enterprise versions ). Beyond the immediate connections, the second and third tier relationships reveal the ripple effects and dependencies that characterise the dynamics of the supply chain ecosystem.

Supply chain sustainability efforts by Apple

Recognizing the environmental impact of its operations,  Apple  has made significant efforts towards supply chain sustainability. The company has set ambitious goals to reduce its carbon footprint, conserve water resources, and minimize waste throughout its supply chain. Apple also works closely with its suppliers to ensure they adhere to strict environmental standards and ethical practices.

To achieve these  sustainability goals , Apple invests in renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind farms, to power its facilities and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The company also collaborates with suppliers to implement energy-efficient manufacturing processes, recycling programs, and responsible waste management practices. These initiatives not only benefit the environment but also contribute to cost savings and operational efficiency.

Challenges faced by Apple’s supply chain

Operating a vast and  complex supply chain  comes with its fair share of challenges. Apple faces the constant pressure to meet high customer demand while maintaining quality standards. The company must manage risks associated with supply chain disruptions, such as natural disasters, political instability, and changes in regulations.

Additionally, as technology advances rapidly, Apple must continuously innovate and introduce new products to stay competitive. This requires close collaboration with suppliers to ensure the timely availability of components and materials. With the ever-changing landscape of the technology industry, Apple’s supply chain must remain agile and adaptable to meet evolving market demands.

Issues and controversies surrounding Apple’s supply chain

Despite its success, Apple’s supply chain has faced scrutiny and controversies over the years. One of the major concerns is the treatment of workers in its supplier factories, particularly in regions like China. Reports of long working hours, low wages, and poor working conditions have tarnished Apple’s reputation and raised questions about its commitment to ethical practices.

Another issue is the use of conflict minerals in Apple’s supply chain. These minerals, such as tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold, are sourced from regions associated with  human rights abuses  and environmental degradation. Apple has taken steps to address this issue by implementing rigorous due diligence processes and working towards a conflict-free supply chain.

Addressing criticisms of Apple’s supply chain

Apple acknowledges the criticisms and has taken steps to address them. The company has implemented supplier responsibility programs, conducting regular audits to ensure compliance with its standards. Apple works closely with suppliers to improve working conditions, provide training opportunities, and promote fair wages. It has also increased  transparency  by publishing annual reports on supplier responsibility, detailing progress and challenges faced.

Furthermore, Apple has actively engaged with non-governmental organizations and industry groups to collaborate on improving supply chain practices. By collaborating with stakeholders, Apple aims to create a positive impact beyond its own operations and influence the industry as a whole.

Apple’s influence over its suppliers

Apple’s size and market dominance give it significant leverage over its suppliers. The company sets strict standards and expectations, requiring suppliers to meet stringent quality,  environmental , and labour standards. This influence extends to product design, where Apple collaborates closely with suppliers to ensure seamless integration of components and materials.

By working closely with suppliers, Apple can maintain control over its supply chain and ensure the delivery of high-quality products to its customers. However, this influence also comes with the responsibility to ensure fair and ethical practices throughout the supply chain.

Impacts of Apple’s supply chain on global markets

Apple’s supply chain has a profound impact on global markets. The company’s ability to manufacture products at scale and deliver them efficiently has disrupted traditional models and reshaped industries. Apple’s success has inspired other companies to adopt similar supply chain strategies, emphasizing efficiency, quality, and innovation.

Moreover, the demand for Apple’s products has created a ripple effect throughout its supply chain, benefiting suppliers and local economies. The scale of Apple’s operations has created job opportunities and economic growth in regions where its suppliers are located. The company’s influence has also driven technological advancements and encouraged collaboration among suppliers to meet Apple’s standards.

Successful initiatives within Apple’s supply chain

Within its  vast and complex supply chain , Apple has implemented several successful initiatives that have had a positive impact. For example, the company has made significant strides in reducing carbon emissions by transitioning to renewable energy sources and promoting energy-efficient manufacturing processes. These initiatives have not only reduced environmental impact but also yielded cost savings for Apple and its suppliers.

Apple has also focused on responsible sourcing of materials, working to eliminate the use of conflict minerals and promoting recycling programs. By partnering with suppliers, Apple has been able to create closed-loop supply chains, where materials from old devices are reused to manufacture new products. This circular approach reduces waste and conserves resources.

The future of Apple’s supply chain and its global market influence

As technology continues to evolve, Apple’s supply chain will face new challenges and opportunities. The company is likely to continue its efforts towards sustainability, pushing for further reductions in its environmental impact and promoting ethical practices throughout the supply chain.

Apple’s influence over its suppliers will remain significant, as the company strives to maintain its position as a market leader. However, with this influence comes the responsibility to ensure fair labor practices, worker welfare, and environmental stewardship.

In conclusion, Apple’s scale and complexity of its supply chain have shaped global markets, driving innovation, and setting new standards. Through its sustainability efforts and initiatives, Apple has demonstrated its commitment to responsible business practices. As consumers increasingly  demand transparency  and ethical sourcing, Apple’s supply chain will continue to be a critical factor in its success and influence on the global market.

Request data on Apple’s supply chain links

Ready to delve deeper into Apple’s intricate supply chain networks? Uncover nuanced data and gain unparalleled insights and supply chain transparency with our data. Elevate your understanding of  Apple’s operations, risks and challenges. Request bespoke data tailored to your specific inquiries and navigate the complex web of one of the world’s technology giants by getting in touch below.

Product details

Teaching and learning

• This case has been featured on our website, click to view the article .