- Home div.mega__menu -->
- Guiding Principles
- Assessment Cycle
- Equity in Assessment
- FAQs About Assessment
- Learning Outcomes & Evidence
- Undergraduate Learning Goals & Outcomes
- University Assessment Reports
- Program Assessment Reports
- University Survey Reports
- Assessment in Action
- Internal Assessment Grant
- Celebrating Assessment at LMU
- Assessment Advisory Committee
- Workshops & Events
- Assessment Resources
- Recommended Websites
- Recommended Books
- Contact div.mega__menu -->
Oral Presentation Example Rubric
Oral Presentation Example Rubric Outcome: Students will graduate with the ability to give professional presentations. Work Product: Oral presentation
Rubric is a modification of one presented by: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1998). Oral presentation rubric . Retrieved October 23, 2008 from http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/pdfRubrics/oralassess.PDF
Creating an Oral Presentation Rubric
In-class activity.
This activity helps students clarify the oral presentation genre; do this after distributing an assignment–in this case, a standard individual oral presentation near the end of the semester which allows students to practice public speaking while also providing a means of workshopping their final paper argument. Together, the class will determine the criteria by which their presentations should–and should not–be assessed.
Guide to Oral/Signed Communication in Writing Classrooms
To collaboratively determine the requirements for students’ oral presentations; to clarify the audience’s expectations of this genre
rhetorical situation; genre; metacognition; oral communication; rubric; assessment; collaboration
- Ask students to free-write and think about these questions: What makes a good oral presentation? Think of examples of oral presentations that you’ve seen, one “bad” and one “good.” They can be from any genre–for example, a course lecture, a museum talk, a presentation you have given, even a video. Jot down specific strengths and weaknesses.
- Facilitate a full-class discussion to list the important characteristics of an oral presentation. Group things together. For example, students may say “speaking clearly” as a strength; elicit specifics (intonation, pace, etc.) and encourage them to elaborate.
- Clarify to students that the more they add to the list, the more information they have in regards to expectations on the oral presentation rubric. If they do not add enough, or specific enough, items, they won’t know what to aim for or how they will be assessed.
- Review the list on the board and ask students to decide what they think are the most important parts of their oral presentations, ranking their top three components.
- Create a second list to the side of the board, called “Let it slide,” asking students what, as a class, they should “let slide” in the oral presentations. Guide and elaborate, choosing whether to reject, accept, or compromise on the students’ proposals.
- Distribute the two lists to students as-is as a checklist-style rubric or flesh the primary list out into a full analytic rubric .
Here’s an example of one possible rubric created from this activity; here’s another example of an oral presentation rubric that assesses only the delivery of the speech/presentation, and which can be used by classmates to evaluate each other.
Advanced Holistic Rubric - Oral Presentation
https://carla.umn.edu/assessment/vac/improvement/e_1.html
- Twin Cities Campus:
- Parking & Transportation
- Maps & Directions
- Directories
- Contact U of M
- Privacy
Rubrics for Oral Presentations
Introduction.
Many instructors require students to give oral presentations, which they evaluate and count in students’ grades. It is important that instructors clarify their goals for these presentations as well as the student learning objectives to which they are related. Embedding the assignment in course goals and learning objectives allows instructors to be clear with students about their expectations and to develop a rubric for evaluating the presentations.
A rubric is a scoring guide that articulates and assesses specific components and expectations for an assignment. Rubrics identify the various criteria relevant to an assignment and then explicitly state the possible levels of achievement along a continuum, so that an effective rubric accurately reflects the expectations of an assignment. Using a rubric to evaluate student performance has advantages for both instructors and students. Creating Rubrics
Rubrics can be either analytic or holistic. An analytic rubric comprises a set of specific criteria, with each one evaluated separately and receiving a separate score. The template resembles a grid with the criteria listed in the left column and levels of performance listed across the top row, using numbers and/or descriptors. The cells within the center of the rubric contain descriptions of what expected performance looks like for each level of performance.
A holistic rubric consists of a set of descriptors that generate a single, global score for the entire work. The single score is based on raters’ overall perception of the quality of the performance. Often, sentence- or paragraph-length descriptions of different levels of competencies are provided.
When applied to an oral presentation, rubrics should reflect the elements of the presentation that will be evaluated as well as their relative importance. Thus, the instructor must decide whether to include dimensions relevant to both form and content and, if so, which one. Additionally, the instructor must decide how to weight each of the dimensions – are they all equally important, or are some more important than others? Additionally, if the presentation represents a group project, the instructor must decide how to balance grading individual and group contributions. Evaluating Group Projects
Creating Rubrics
The steps for creating an analytic rubric include the following:
1. Clarify the purpose of the assignment. What learning objectives are associated with the assignment?
2. Look for existing rubrics that can be adopted or adapted for the specific assignment
3. Define the criteria to be evaluated
4. Choose the rating scale to measure levels of performance
5. Write descriptions for each criterion for each performance level of the rating scale
6. Test and revise the rubric
Examples of criteria that have been included in rubrics for evaluation oral presentations include:
- Knowledge of content
- Organization of content
- Presentation of ideas
- Research/sources
- Visual aids/handouts
- Language clarity
- Grammatical correctness
- Time management
- Volume of speech
- Rate/pacing of Speech
- Mannerisms/gestures
- Eye contact/audience engagement
Examples of scales/ratings that have been used to rate student performance include:
- Strong, Satisfactory, Weak
- Beginning, Intermediate, High
- Exemplary, Competent, Developing
- Excellent, Competent, Needs Work
- Exceeds Standard, Meets Standard, Approaching Standard, Below Standard
- Exemplary, Proficient, Developing, Novice
- Excellent, Good, Marginal, Unacceptable
- Advanced, Intermediate High, Intermediate, Developing
- Exceptional, Above Average, Sufficient, Minimal, Poor
- Master, Distinguished, Proficient, Intermediate, Novice
- Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Poor, Unacceptable
- Always, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
- Exemplary, Accomplished, Acceptable, Minimally Acceptable, Emerging, Unacceptable
Grading and Performance Rubrics Carnegie Mellon University Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation
Creating and Using Rubrics Carnegie Mellon University Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation
Using Rubrics Cornell University Center for Teaching Innovation
Building a Rubric University of Texas/Austin Faculty Innovation Center
Building a Rubric Columbia University Center for Teaching and Learning
Creating and Using Rubrics Yale University Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning
Types of Rubrics DePaul University Teaching Commons
Creating Rubrics University of Texas/Austin Faculty Innovation Center
Examples of Oral Presentation Rubrics
Oral Presentation Rubric Pomona College Teaching and Learning Center
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric University of Michigan
Oral Presentation Rubric Roanoke College
Oral Presentation: Scoring Guide Fresno State University Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Presentation Skills Rubric State University of New York/New Paltz School of Business
Oral Presentation Rubric Oregon State University Center for Teaching and Learning
Oral Presentation Rubric Purdue University College of Science
Group Class Presentation Sample Rubric Pepperdine University Graziadio Business School
Eberly Center
Teaching excellence & educational innovation, grading and performance rubrics, what are rubrics.
A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly represents the performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric divides the assigned work into component parts and provides clear descriptions of the characteristics of the work associated with each component, at varying levels of mastery. Rubrics can be used for a wide array of assignments: papers, projects, oral presentations, artistic performances, group projects, etc. Rubrics can be used as scoring or grading guides, to provide formative feedback to support and guide ongoing learning efforts, or both.
Advantages of Using Rubrics
Using a rubric provides several advantages to both instructors and students. Grading according to an explicit and descriptive set of criteria that is designed to reflect the weighted importance of the objectives of the assignment helps ensure that the instructor’s grading standards don’t change over time. Grading consistency is difficult to maintain over time because of fatigue, shifting standards based on prior experience, or intrusion of other criteria. Furthermore, rubrics can reduce the time spent grading by reducing uncertainty and by allowing instructors to refer to the rubric description associated with a score rather than having to write long comments. Finally, grading rubrics are invaluable in large courses that have multiple graders (other instructors, teaching assistants, etc.) because they can help ensure consistency across graders and reduce the systematic bias that can be introduced between graders.
Used more formatively, rubrics can help instructors get a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses of their class. By recording the component scores and tallying up the number of students scoring below an acceptable level on each component, instructors can identify those skills or concepts that need more instructional time and student effort.
Grading rubrics are also valuable to students. A rubric can help instructors communicate to students the specific requirements and acceptable performance standards of an assignment. When rubrics are given to students with the assignment description, they can help students monitor and assess their progress as they work toward clearly indicated goals. When assignments are scored and returned with the rubric, students can more easily recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their work and direct their efforts accordingly.
Examples of Rubrics
Here are links to a diverse set of rubrics designed by Carnegie Mellon faculty and faculty at other institutions. Although your particular field of study and type of assessment activity may not be represented currently, viewing a rubric that is designed for a similar activity may provide you with ideas on how to divide your task into components and how to describe the varying levels of mastery.
Paper Assignments
- Example 1: Philosophy Paper This rubric was designed for student papers in a range of philosophy courses, CMU.
- Example 2: Psychology Assignment Short, concept application homework assignment in cognitive psychology, CMU.
- Example 3: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing assignments in anthropology, CMU.
- Example 4: History Research Paper . This rubric was designed for essays and research papers in history, CMU.
- Example 1: Capstone Project in Design This rubric describes the components and standard of performance from the research phase to the final presentation for a senior capstone project in the School of Design, CMU.
- Example 2: Engineering Design Project This rubric describes performance standards on three aspects of a team project: Research and Design, Communication, and Team Work.
Oral Presentations
- Example 1: Oral Exam This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing performance on an oral exam in an upper-division history course, CMU.
- Example 2: Oral Communication
- Example 3: Group Presentations This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing group presentations in a history course, CMU.
Class Participation/Contributions
- Example 1: Discussion Class This rubric assesses the quality of student contributions to class discussions. This is appropriate for an undergraduate-level course, CMU.
- Example 2: Advanced Seminar This rubric is designed for assessing discussion performance in an advanced undergraduate or graduate seminar.
November 11, 2024
Presentation scoring rubric: What is it and how to make one
Need a presentation scoring rubric? Here's a helpful template to get started
Do you need to grade students or evaluate coworkers on their presentations? You can use a presentation scoring rubric to provide feedback for improvement.
We’ll explain what a presentation scoring rubric is, how to create one, and how to use Plus AI to gather more details about this helpful tool.
What is a presentation scoring rubric?
Most commonly used in educational scenarios, a presentation scoring rubric is used to assess a presentation. The scoring rubric includes specific criteria for a structured framework to measure performance.
The rubric is not only intended to provide a score (and thus a grade) to the student or presenter, but to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide the presenter toward improvement.
In business scenarios, a scoring rubric can be used for training purposes or for refining presentations when those presentations are key forms of communication.
Scoring rubric categories
You’ll find several categories for the scoring criteria. Most are common to presentations; however, you can add, remove, or adjust the categories per your scenario.
- Content : Relevance of the presented information.
- Organization : Sequence or flow of the presentation.
- Knowledge : Understanding of the topic.
- Communication or delivery : Speaking skills and nonverbal communication.
- Engagement : Ability to connect with the audience.
- Visuals or visual aids : Graphics, media, design, and layout.
- Mechanics : Grammar and spelling.
- Time management : Ability to meet time limits or requirements.
- Creativity : Innovative aspects of the presentation.
- Overall impact : Overall assessment of how well the presentation achieved its purpose and impacted the audience.
You can adjust your scoring rubric accordingly for each course, project, or other scenario. For example, if the presentation is for a class project with certain requirements, you might add a specific category to score how well the student meets each requirement.
Tip : Share these ways to make Google Slides look good or improve the appearance of your PowerPoint slides !
Rubric scoring scale
Presentation scoring rubrics normally use a three-, four-, or five-point scale. The scale can use a numerical and/or descriptive scoring system.
For instance, you can score each category on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 being Unacceptable and 5 being Excellent. Or, you can score with a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being Weak and 3 being Strong.
With each category, an explanation of the score is provided. To obtain the score for that category, the presenter meets the description provided for that score. Here’s an example for a Content category with a 4-point scoring scale.
The person evaluating the presentation, enters the score for each category in the column on the right. When the presentation is complete, the total score is calculated and provided to and optionally discussed with the presenter.
It’s also helpful to include a key for understanding the final score as shown in this example:
Tip : Help your presenters by sharing these top tips for effective presentations .
How do you create a presentation scoring rubric?
To create a presentation scoring rubric, you can use your go-to word processing application like Google Docs or Microsoft Word.
Insert a table which lists the criteria in the left-hand column, scoring scale in the top row, and a score column (for each category) on the right. You can also include a total score at the bottom as shown below.
To assemble the rubric:
- Define and list the criteria you want to use. Again, the categories can differ depending on the type and purpose of the presentation.
- Determine and enter the scoring scale and whether it should be numerical, descriptive, or both.
- Write the description for each category corresponding to each score on the scale.
- Optionally include a key for the total score at the bottom.
Want to use the template above? Head to the Presentation Scoring Rubric Template in Google Docs, select Make a copy , and then save the document to your account. You can then edit it per your needs and reuse it as you like.
Get help with a presentation scoring rubric from Plus AI
Plus AI is a terrific tool for creating and editing presentations, but it’s also a super helpful add-in for research! You can ask Plus to make a scoring rubric presentation and see helpful details and tips to set up your own rubric.
With useful information, you can refer to the content in this completed slideshow as you create the rubric. You may also add slides that include further details!
You can use Plus AI with Google Slides and Docs along with Microsoft PowerPoint . Check out the Plus AI website for details, example presentations, and information for starting your free trial.
If you’ve been tasked with creating a presentation scoring rubric for your students, coworkers, or peers, you now have the basics you need to get started. And remember, you can use the rubric template provided above and Plus AI for further help creating your rubric.
For your own successful slideshows, look at how to start a presentation along with how to end a presentation .
What is the 5/5/5 rule for better presentations?
Some experts recommend the 5/5/5 rule when creating presentations. This rule suggests no more than five words per line of text, five lines of text per slide, or five text-heavy slides in a row.
What is the Kawasaki presentation rule?
Guy Kawasaki popularized the 10/20/30 rule for effective presentations. This rule recommends a limit of 10 slides, a total presentation time within 20 minutes, and a font size of no less than 30 points.
What is a good talking speed for a presentation?
An average of 100 to 150 words per minute is common for presentations. For details on calculating words per minute and other tools you can use, check out Finding Your Speaking Rate on the Plus website.
Latest posts
Latest post.
Can AI tools replace content writers?
When do you think AI will replace writers? My thoughts as a professional content writer
PowerPoint Karaoke
Overview of PowerPoint Karaoke, rules, and free slide decks for PowerPoint Karaoke
A guide to all of Google’s AI products
A comprehensive guide to Google's AI ecosystem, categorizing all of Google's AI products and analyzing the ways that Google AI products have evolved over time.
More resources
How to write an effective ai prompt.
10 tips and tricks to write good AI prompts and get better outputs from Plus AI and other AI tools
A comprehensive guide to using AI in Google Slides
This comprehensive guide provides an overview of how to use AI technology within Google Slides
How to Check Word Count on Google Slides
How to get the word count of a Google Slides presentation
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Beginning Developing Proficient Mastery. 2 3 4. A. Content. Topic lacks relevance or focus; presentation contains multiple fact errors. Topic would benefit from more focus; presentation contains some fact errors or omissions. Topic is adequately focused and relevant; major facts are accurate and generally complete.
Scoring Rubrics for Academic Presentations . Presenter(s) _____ Reviewer _____ Criteria . Weak Fair Good Strong Best . Organization : Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for ... Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1 Author: Testing and Evaluation Services Created Date:
This rubric is designed to help you evaluate the organization, design, and delivery of standard research talks and other oral presentations. Here are some ways to use it: Distribute the rubric to colleagues before a dress rehearsal of your talk. Use the rubric to collect feedback and improve your presentation and delivery.
Oral Presentation Grading Rubric Name: _____ Overall Score: /40 Nonverbal Skills 4 - Exceptional 3 - Admirable 2 - Acceptable 1 - Poor Eye Contact Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes or slides. Consistent use of direct eye ...
This rubric best applies to presentations of sufficient length such that a central message is conveyed, supported by one or more forms of supporting materials, and includes a purposeful organization. An oral answer to a single question not designed to be structured into a presentation does not readily apply to this rubric. Glossary
The goal of this rubric is to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. • Self-assessment: Record yourself presenting your talk using your computer's pre-downloaded recording software or by using the coach in Microsoft PowerPoint. Then review your recording, fill in the rubric ...
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
overly text-heavy, distracting, unconnected to claim, or otherwise claim, or otherwise presentation. ineffective. connected to claim, and effectively help support. Speech and manner (eye contact, volume, clarity, pacing) Speech and manner One or more are not effective: pacing may be too fast or slow; eye contact may not be present; voice may be ...
S. Jodoin, McGill University, 2019 RUBRIC FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ORAL PRESENTATIONS Category Scoring Criteria Grade Framing (20%) The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. Content (50%)
Oral Presentations. Example 1: Oral Exam This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing performance on an oral exam in an upper-division course in history (Carnegie Mellon). Example 2: Oral Communication This rubric is adapted from Huba and Freed, 2000.
Oral Presentation Example Rubric. Outcome: Students will graduate with the ability to give professional presentations. Idea development, use of language, and the organization of ideas are effectively used to achieve a purpose. A. Ideas are clearly organized, developed, and supported to achieve a purpose; the purpose is clear. B.
Oral Presentation Rubric Exemplary Proficient Developing Novice PRESENTATION CONTENT Introduction Introduced topic, established rapport and explained the purpose of presentation in creative, clear way capturing attention. Introduced presentation in clear way. Started with a self introduction or "My topic is" before capturing attention.
Oral Presentations Scoring Rubric. Oral presentations are expected to completely address the topic and requirements set forth in the assignment, and are appropriate for the intended audience. Oral presentations are expected to provide an appropriate level of analysis, discussion and evaluation as required by the assignment.
Research Oral Presentation Rubric. Presentation follows scientific method (use research paper outline as your guide) in the proper sequential order. Student does not seem to understand their research project and is not able to interpret results. Student creates a good presentation but could improve on displaying data and has a few errors in ...
Create a second list to the side of the board, called "Let it slide," asking students what, as a class, they should "let slide" in the oral presentations. Guide and elaborate, choosing whether to reject, accept, or compromise on the students' proposals. Distribute the two lists to students as-is as a checklist-style rubric or flesh ...
Advanced Holistic Rubric - Oral Presentation. 3. Student presents all relevant information clearly with a wide variety of sentence structures, grammatical forms, and specific vocabulary. Presentation contributes to the understanding of the intended audience. There may be minor errors that do not impact comprehensibility.
Oral Presentation Rubric. No movement or descriptive gestures. Very little movement or descriptive gestures. Movements or gestures enhance articulation. Movements seemed fluid and helped the audience visualize. No eye contact with audience. Minimal eye contact with audience. Consistent use of direct eye. contact with some audience.
The steps for creating an analytic rubric include the following: 1. Clarify the purpose of the assignment. What learning objectives are associated with the assignment? 2. Look for existing rubrics that can be adopted or adapted for the specific assignment. 3.
Benefits for Students Benefits for Instructors; Enhanced learning outcomes: Research has shown that rubrics can improve student learning outcomes by providing clear expectations and feedback on assignments (Andrade, 2010).: Improved efficiency: Rubrics can save faculty time in the grading process, as they can quickly and objectively assess student work based on predetermined criteria (Reeves ...
Example 1: Oral Exam This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing performance on an oral exam in an upper-division history course, CMU. Example 2: Oral Communication. Example 3: Group Presentations This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing group presentations in a history course, CMU.
Speaker has excellent posture. 10. Eye contact may focus on only one member of the audience or a select few members. Mildly distracting nervous habits are present but do not override the content. 5. Very little eye contact is made with the audience. It may sound like the speaker is reading the presentation.
Presentation scoring rubrics normally use a three-, four-, or five-point scale. The scale can use a numerical and/or descriptive scoring system. For instance, you can score each category on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 being Unacceptable and 5 being Excellent. Or, you can score with a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being Weak and 3 being Strong.