Online learning and problem-solving skills during the COVID-19 pandemic (framework for designing instruction and assessment)

  • Development Article
  • Published: 11 November 2024

Cite this article

computer based learning environments and problem solving

  • Abeer Aidh Alshwiah   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-0138 1  

31 Accesses

Explore all metrics

This article explores: (1) the barriers facing students and teachers regarding this type of assessment, and (2) a proposed framework for overcoming these barriers. In this study, the barriers and corresponding assessment techniques were determined by interviewing a sample of 17 students and five teachers. The main barrier reported by the students was the difficulty of group work, whereas the teachers found it difficult to assess manual teaching aids. Thus, a framework was proposed to address these barriers by enhancing students’ collaboration and developing their problem-solving skills through authentic activities. The effectiveness of this framework was ascertained in this study by examining the development of the students’ problem-solving skills and their perceptions of the learning design. After the experiment, there was development in some constructs of the problem-solving skills. From an analysis of the students’ responses, it was revealed that they had very positive perceptions of the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

computer based learning environments and problem solving

Similar content being viewed by others

computer based learning environments and problem solving

Unpacking engineering students’ challenges and strategies in a fully online learning space: The mediating role of teachers

computer based learning environments and problem solving

Online Classes: Lessons Learned During the Pandemic

computer based learning environments and problem solving

Online teaching in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic

Explore related subjects.

  • Digital Education and Educational Technology

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abduh, M. (2021). Full-time online assessment during COVID-19 lockdown: EFL teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 28 (1), 1–22.

Google Scholar  

Agustiningsih, R., & Rahdiyanta, D. (2019). Implementation of an authentic assessment model to improve the quality of learning assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 25 (1), 103–115.

Article   Google Scholar  

Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students’ perceptions of e-assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 16 (1), 147–153.

Alshwiah, A. A. (2021). Barriers to online learning: Adjusting to the ‘new normal’ in the time of COVID-19. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22 (4), 212–228.

Alt, D. (2014). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring features of constructivist learning environments in higher education. Frontline Learning Research, 2 (3), 1–28.

Alt, D. (2017). Constructivist learning and openness to diversity and challenge in higher education environments. Learning Environments Research, 20 (1), 99–119.

Alverson, J., Schwartz, J., & Shultz, S. (2019). Authentic assessment of student learning in an online class: Implications for embedded practice. College & Research Libraries, 80 (1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.5860/CRL.80.1.32

Ana, A., Minghat, A. D., Purnawarman, P., Saripudin, S., Muktiarni, M., Dwiyanti, V., & Mustakim, S. S. (2020). Students’ perceptions of the twists and turns of e-learning in the midst of the Covid 19 outbreak. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12 (1), 15–26.

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39 (2), 205–222.

Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100 (7), e24821.

Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide . Elsevier.

Book   Google Scholar  

Bruner, J. (1984). Actual minds, possible worlds . Harvard University Press.

Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29 (4), 250–264.

Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 466–487.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage dictionary of statistics: A practical resource for students in the social sciences . Sage.

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26 (2), 43–71.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1 (1), 1–23.

Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: An investigation on students and teachers’ perceptions. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5 (2), 265–284.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87–105.

Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: Class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48 (4), 283–299.

Gulikers, J. T., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (3), 67.

Gulikers, J. T., Bastiaens, T. J., & Martens, R. L. (2005). The surplus value of an authentic learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21 (3), 509–521.

Heppner, P. P., & Anderson, W. P. (1985). The relationship between problem-solving, self-appraisal and psychological adjustment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9 , 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173090

Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Herrington, A. (2007). Authentic learning on the web: Guidelines for course design. In Flexible learning in an information society (pp. 26–35). IGI Global.

Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40 (1), 1–14.

Jamil, M., Tariq, R. H., & Shami, P. A. (2012). Computer-based vs paper-based examinations: Perceptions of university teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 11 (4), 371–381.

Karantzas, G. C., Avery, M. R., Macfarlane, S., Mussap, A., Tooley, G., Hazelwood, Z., & Fitness, J. (2013). Enhancing critical analysis and problem-solving skills in undergraduate psychology: An evaluation of a collaborative learning and problem-based learning approach. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65 (1), 38–45.

Kitishat, A. R., Al Omar, K. H., & Al Momani, M. A. K. (2020). The Covid-19 crisis and distance learning: E-teaching of language between reality and challenges. Asian ESP Journal, 16 (51), 316–326.

Klegeris, A., Bahniwal, M., & Hurren, H. (2013). Improvement in generic problem-solving abilities of students by use of tutor-less problem-based learning in a large classroom setting. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12 (1), 73–79.

Knobloch, N. A. (2003). Is experiential learning authentic? Journal of Agricultural Education, 44 (4), 22–34.

Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54 (1), 3–13.

Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A. E., & Liao, T. F. (2003). The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods . Sage Publication.

Lohman, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. (2000). Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness. Instructional Science, 28 (4), 291–307.

Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1 (2007), 1–12.

MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 23 (4), 38–41.

Muqdadi, Y., & Abu Zayton, J. (2010). The effect of a training program in rational emotive education on improving social competence, problem solving skills of male students at seventh and eighth grades. Islamic University Journal, 18 (2), 521–555.

Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: Students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8 (2), 783–793.

Olfos, R., & Zulantay, H. (2007). Reliability and validity of authentic assessment in a web based course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 156–173.

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online . Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language . MIT Press.

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14 (3), 873–892.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society . Harvard University Press.

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5 , 1–14.

Warner, R. M. (2008). Applied statistics . Sage.

Yeen-Ju, H. T., Mai, N., & Selvaretnam, B. (2015). Enhancing problem-solving skills in an authentic blended learning environment: A Malaysian context. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5 (11), 841.

Yeh, Y. C. (2009). Integrating e-learning into the direct-instruction model to enhance the effectiveness of critical-thinking instruction. Instructional Science, 37 (2), 185–203.

Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24 (1), 38–53.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Educational Technology, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, 34243, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Abeer Aidh Alshwiah

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abeer Aidh Alshwiah .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Alshwiah, A.A. Online learning and problem-solving skills during the COVID-19 pandemic (framework for designing instruction and assessment). Education Tech Research Dev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10430-5

Download citation

Accepted : 30 October 2024

Published : 11 November 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10430-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Problem-solving skills
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving (NATO Asi

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

  2. Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (1992 edition

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

  3. (PDF) Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

  4. (PDF) Analysing domain-specific problem-solving processes within

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

  5. (PDF) Improving problem solving performance in computer-based learning

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

  6. (PDF) Evidence-Centered Design and Its Application to Collaborative

    computer based learning environments and problem solving

COMMENTS

  1. Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving

    About this book. Most would agree that the acquisition of problem-solving ability is a primary goal of education. The emergence of the new information technologiesin the last ten years has raised high expectations with respect to the possibilities of the computer as an instructional tool for enhancing students' problem-solving skills.

  2. Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving

    Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving, held in Leuven, Belgium, September 26-29, 1990. CR Subject Classification (1991): K.3.1, J.4, 1.2. ISBN 3-540-55048-8 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. SBN 0-387-55048-8 Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg Thts work ...

  3. Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving

    A computer-based investigation environment that incorporates domain-specific strategic support is described, where students investigate an episode of natural selection in the wild and the complementary roles of this environment and student-teacher discussions in both small-group and wholeclass formats in supporting science learning are illustrated.

  4. Computer-Based Learning Environments for Deeper Learning in ...

    Introduction. Learning through problem solving has been widely promoted in educational practice, and more recently in computer-based learning environments (CBLEs). However, effective learning through problem solving is difficult to realize since learning in such contexts often involves complex cognitive processes that are inaccessible to novices.

  5. Editors Minhong (Maggie) Wang Paul A. Kirschner Susan M ...

    Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer-Based Learning Environments for Deep Learning in Inquiry and Problem-Solving Contexts – The Pre-Conference Workshop at ICLS 2016, Singapore Toward an assessment algorithm for evaluating online collaboration to promote deep and useful understanding of conceptual material Sharon J. Derry*

  6. Online learning and problem-solving skills during the COVID ...

    Problem-based learning (PBL) is a creative method of instruction, used in the context of education. It may be defined as a student-focused approach to learning, aimed at providing students with authentic but ill-structured tasks and resources, with the intention of developing their critical-thinking and problem-solving skills, among other things (Karantzas et al., 2013; Klegeris et al., 2013 ...